So it appears you want to fight. Nitpicking almost everything I said so here goes...RagingR2 wrote:A wall of text, full of stupidity and lies"I dont know who thq is" If its not going to help your cause it doesnt exist ? Like when some claims that man is creating global warming and the global cooling from the 40s to 1970 never existed
Wow a wall of text I thought you hated those but that must have been another lie..so you want to fight more you lying creep. Yeah that right I proved you lied mr "1 typo".. Especially ones who still state that "I said Stainless being bankrupt" is FACT. idiot. how many times do I have to post the same thing. Oh thats right 12 pages or so. Getting caught with 1 lie can be a misjudgement but around TWELVE ???(remember to make your argument on the fact it wasnt actually 12)
AGAIN I posted a link toward what is called EVIDENCE toward MR Ds claim NOT FACT. Still lying I see to help your agenda. Are you happy now that you learned how to spell bankruptcy cause thats all you spout "bankruptcy this, bankruptcy that, no proof of bankruptcy"
Oh sure you thinking "it was only 1 lie, but there is more One of MANY links on THQ idiot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THQ they made Saints row 3 then went bankrupt and then they made Saints row 4 . Its called the internet. you can easily look up what you do not know.No wonder you had only 34 posts in 6 years. It must take you that long to know how to read properly You make less sense than me.For someone that doesnt know what game I am talking about. you sure know a lot about their history. trying to debunk me again ? Another lie ? You claim "if they went bankrupt" and then state facts about their bankruptcy. Yup, another lie within the same paragraph. You mention liquidation which every person knows liquidation means BANKRUPTCY.
BTW I only mentioned one example if passing which was THQ I pretty much asked "remember THQ" and got a bible worth of worthless information.It did not need a wall of text about their history unless of course you were going out of your was to debunk every word in my postings. You ask for me not to post a wall of text and here we are reading YOUR huge wall of text. So I guess even your own rules dont apply to you ?
while we are on the subject https://www.wired.com/2013/01/thq-bankrupt/ (Sega nordic ?)
The response I made about moderators was because I was referring to the original posters claim that MR D may have deleted it.. I know that to your readers that brain supply is in demand but at least THINK if you have a question about a post . It is what is known as constructive criticism. Teaching someone how a forum works.. The minute you learn how to spell bankruptcy and now your an expert ? You are trying to undermine me and yet you look like a fool. The fact is THQ went bankrupt, no matter what situations happened afterward. Bankrupt A term I am sure you are familiar with
Why go back and discuss a post when you previously ignored it existed ?
End of discussion, liar. tried to let go and get on topic and yet this wall of bullshit happened. You just want to fight to "prove" your opinion. I may have a bug up my ass but at least I tried to settle. I would expect Mr Deviance to lie considering his name has "deviant" in it. Hard to discuss when you have to question almost ever word Dont chat with liars. Now you make sure to question everything I typed trying to make ME a liar
"So you really have no right to accuse anyone of going off topic." actually MY post to the original poster was on topic. remember you kept calling it "proof of bankruptcy which I might add was the subject at hand. Yet you went on some personal attack on me because you ASSUMED (ass) it was some kind of proof which I repeatedly said it was NOT proof but evidence
Thanks for replying Shane but I have some questions. Sorry to say back to the waiting